|
|||||||||||||
| Length: | 13 hours, 59 minutes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratings: | |||||||||||||
| Formats
|
|
||||||||||||
| Tell Your Friends: | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Length: | 13 hours, 59 minutes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratings: | |||||||||||||
| Formats
|
|
||||||||||||
| Tell Your Friends: | |||||||||||||
The best take away from this book, is that when one person believes in the unreal they are deemed crazy. When several people believe it is called religion.
I am already an Atheist, although Dawkins makes me much more confident in my stance. There is not one EUREKA moment that makes you more aware of your beliefs, but there is a good collection of common sense argument.
Dawkin's arguments are logical and irrefutable in most cases. The God of the OT is cruel and sociopathic. For one who was a brainwashed "catholic child," it is embarrassing to remember that I once was in thrall to its mythology. But the worst part is the intellectual and psychological damage inflicted by its proponents. My one objection is the frequent intrusion of certitude and absolutism to otherwise objective arguments.
I don't understand the review that claimed that Dawkins isn't "anti-religious." I'm an atheist and found this to be a screed. It had some interesting points, but was largely a diatribe against organized religion. At times I found it difficult to remember that Dawkins is a well regarded scientist...he went out of his way, not to defend atheism, but to trash religion. And I'm already on his side!
This is a terrific book, but not for the beach. Some of the more technical philosophical and scientific arguments required a couple listens to follow. Personally, I found the most enjoyable parts of the book to be the chapters on the impossibility of using the Bible as a guide for modern ethics. Those chapters alone are worth a listen. Dawkins is not "anti-religious," he's pro-reason. Probably easier to read in book form, but recommended nonetheless.
I was highly anticipating this title, but found it very boring and did not get past disk 2. The arguments were vague and hard to understand.
Dawkins book does a fantastic job describing the battle between Evolutionists vs. Creationists. He describes example after example of the arguments for Creationism, then logically walks through why each argument fails. I found that part of this book both highly amusing, as well as enlightening. The book itself was thought provoking, and I did agree with much of it. However, in general, I found him to be as militant and intolerant in his belief in Atheism as well as the obsolescence of Religion in general, as those he is writing about in the Religious world. Overall, it was a good read. It has some good points to make, but hasn't changed my personal beliefs all that much.
This book is a bit slow and tedious. It seems difficult to prove or disprove that God exists, and the arguments in the book are not persuasive beyond doubt. That said, there is some interesting material here particularly for someone who has a specific interest in religion.
Richard Dawkins is a world-renowned evolutionary biologist and author. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society and, until recently, held the Charles Simonyi Chair of Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. His first book, "The Selfish Gene", was an instant international bestseller, and has become an established classic work of modern evolutionary biology. He is also the author of "The Blind Watchmaker", "River Out of Eden", "Climbing Mount Improbable", "Unweaving the Rainbow", "A Devil's Chaplain", "The Ancestor's Tale", and most recently, "The God Delusion.
N.B." "The Greatest Sho